Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.thejh.org

Original Article

Volume 8, Number 2, June 2019, pages 47-54


Plasma Factors for the Differentiation of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Diffused Large B Cell Lymphoma and for Monitoring Remission

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Soluble CD30 (sCD30) and CCL22 have diagnostic potential for HL patients. Medians with interquartile ranges of (a) sCD30, (b) CCL22 and (c) CXCL13 plasma levels in healthy donors, new cases of HL patients and DLBCL patients are shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Screening of soluble factors for the confirmation of remission status of cHL. Plasma of different cHL patients at diagnosis (new cases (NC)) were compared with plasma of healthy controls (HC) and plasma of cHL patients in remission (Rem). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney test).
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Verification of soluble factors for the confirmation of remission status of cHL. Eight pairs of cHL patient plasma before treatment (new case (NC)) and after remission (Rem) were measured for TNFR2 level. *P < 0.05 (two-tailed, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test).
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Soluble factors for the confirmation of remission status of DLBCL. Eight pairs of DLBCL patient plasmas before treatment (new cases (NC)) and after remission (Rem) were analyzed for (a) IL-2, (b) sIL-2R, and (c) IL-31 concentrations. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (two-tailed, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test).

Tables

Table 1. Statistics of the Patients
 
CasesAge/median (interquartile range)
At initial diagnosis (remission %)aDuring treatment or relapseIn remissionTotal (remission %)aAt initial diagnosisTotal
aNumbers in parenthesis indicate the percentage of patients who eventually achieved remission. bSeven cases are from patients already included in the screening test for initial diagnosis.
Screening test
  cHL13 (61.5%)142649 (73.5%)27 (22.25, 33.25)28 (23, 38.5)
  DLBCL22 (59.1%)0-22 (59.1%)61 (50.75, 72.75)61 (50.75, 72.75)
  Healthy controls---1227 (25, 29.75)
Verification test
  cHL8b88--
  DLBCL888--

 

Table 2. Soluble Factors That Occur at Concentrations Significantly Different Between the Plasma of Initially Diagnosed cHL Patients and Healthy Controls
 
Healthy controlHL initial diagnosisDLBCL initial diagnosisP (cHL vs. healthy)P (cHL vs. DLBCL)
Listed are the median values of respective concentrations (pg/mL). aThe three soluble factors that are both significantly different in cHL vs. healthy control, and in cHL vs. DLBCL. P values were calculated using Mann-Whitney U test. ND: not detectable.
sCD137L8.5955.7046.090.005910.724
sCD13753.0664.38159.300.549630.009
sBAFFND31.584.550.002780.159
CXCL13a81.19279.84152.410.000090.041
sCD30a141.79885.04369.440.000020.015
ENA78ND142.28270.100.000050.555
Eotaxin11.8030.3325.130.001100.428
Eotaxin-243.3994.3863.220.031640.169
FGF-2ND11.47ND0.008280.408
HGF11.85110.24140.760.000070.302
IFN-γND55.7954.080.000020.88
IL-15ND7.794.810.006730.319
IL-16562.79262.40463.370.012330.041
IL-18ND77.19102.400.000190.933
IL-2R1,982.099,679.9410,279.120.003310.533
IL-20ND4.600.570.014270.062
IL-23ND22.07ND0.035620.408
IL-3ND33.2515.010.001260.302
IL-31ND102.7241.640.008280.489
IL-4ND26.523.930.014060.287
IL-7ND1.041.170.000390.88
IL-8ND1.01ND0.035570.625
IL-9ND4.690.960.017620.987
IP-105.1047.3939.940.000070.428
CCL81.0510.249.150.000090.353
CCL22a67.01619.59128.300.003610.013
MIP-1 αND7.053.270.022830.169
MIP-3 αND17.4417.440.008280.462
SDF-1 α465.55NDND0.000260.801
TSLPND17.0312.610.004510.169
VEGF-AND35.2115.070.001260.257