Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.thejh.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 4, December 2018, pages 140-148


Morphology and Chromic Status of Red Blood Cells Are Significantly Influenced by Gestational Diabetes

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Distribution of the enrolled study subjects into the GDM, DM and control groups.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The mean percentages of cells found in different patient groups to be (a) microcytic hypochromic, (b) macrocytic and (c) anisocytic among the total of their own cell types in the groups. Comparisons of their standard deviations and P-values are illustrated.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Observed microscopic pictures showing (a) anisocytosis with microcytosis and hypochromia in a GDM case, (b) anisocytosis with microcytosis, hypochromia and target cells in a DM case.

Tables

Table 1. Reference Guide for Grading Red Blood Cell Morphology (RBC-M) /hpf (100 × oil) [19]
 
RBCs descriptionNormalOccasional/rareMild/slight +1Moderate +2Marked +3
MCV: mean corpuscular volume; MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, fL: femtoliter; pg: pictogram.
MicrocyteMCV 80 - 99 fLMCV 70 - 79 fL (25% smaller than nucleus of small lymphocyte)MCV 60 - 69 fL (26-49% smaller than nucleus of small lymphocyte)MCV < 60 fL (≥ 50% smaller than nucleus of small lymphocyte)
MacrocyteMCV 100 - 110 fL (25% larger than nucleus of small lymphocyte)MCV 111 - 125 fL (26-49% larger than nucleus of small lymphocyte)MCV > 125 fL (≥ 50% larger than nucleus of small lymphocyte)
HypochromasiaMCH 27 - 34 pg< 5% but present5-15% (MCH 2 - 26 pg)16-40% (MCH 18 - 21 pg)> 40% (MCH < 18 pg)
Polychromasia< 3% but present3-5%6-20%> 20%
Target cells< 5% but present5-10%11-25%> 25%
Oval macrocytes< 5% but present6-20%21-50%> 50%
Anisocytosis< 15%15-25%26-49%50-89%
Poikilocytosis< 1%1-5%6-10%> 10%

 

Table 2. Demographics and Laboratory Properties of the GDM, DM and Control Groups Shown as Mean ± Standard Deviation
 
VariablesGDMDMControl
BMI: body mass index; FBG: fasting blood glucose; RBCs: red blood cells; Hb: hemoglobin; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; HCT: hematocrit; MPV: mean platelet volume; RDW: red cells distribution width.
Age (years)33.33 ± 4.834 ± 5.132.13 ± 2.8
Parity (number)2.73 ± 1.82.17 ± 1.41.47 ± 1.3
Gestational age (weeks)34.8 ± 2.935.5 ± 234.7 ± 4.6
BMI (kg/m2)35.024 ± 3.135.02 ± 5.334.744 ± 4.4
FBS (mg/dL)148.62 ± 42.5164.99 ± 34.576.4 ± 10.2
RBCs (106/uL)4.217 ± 0.54.207 ± 0.454.181 ± 0.4
Hb (g/dL)11.15 ± 1.110.89 ± 1.311.543 ± 1.2
MCV (fL)80.3 ± 4.678.2 ± 33.383 ± 34.6
HCT (%)32.9 ± 5.633.3 ± 4.134.6 ± 3.4
RDW (%)15.65 ± 2.216.19 ± 2.815.25 ± 3

 

Table 3. The Comparison of Variables’ Means
 
P-value (GDM vs. control)P-value (GDM vs. DM)
BMI: body mass index; FBG: fasting blood glucose; RBCs: red blood cells; Hb: hemoglobin; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; HCT: hematocrit; MPV: mean platelet volume; RDW: red cells distribution width. *P-values denoting statistical significance.
Age0.2320.572
Parity0.002*0.153
Gestational age0.10.268
BMI0.7570.997
FBS0.001*0.08
RBCs0.7390.92
Hb0.530.739
MCV0.034*0.308
HCT0.1520.742
RDW0.5230.366

 

Table 4. The Counts and Percentages of the Different RBCs Morphological Variables Among the Studying Groups: GDM, DM and Control
 
RBCs morphologyGDMDMControlTotal count
CountPercentageCountPercentageCountPercentage
Normocytic normochromic
  Yes2357.50%930%2583.30%57
  No1742.50%2170%516.70%43
Microcytic hypochromic
  Few1640%1635.30%413.30%36
  No2460%1446.70%2686.70%64
Anisocytosis
  Mild1742.50%2893.30%310%48
  No2357.50%26.70%2790%52
Poikilocytosis
  Mild37.50%1240%0016
  No3792.50%1860%30100%86
Target cells
  Occasional512.50%1240%0017
  No3587.50%1860%30100%83
Macrocytes
  Occasional410%1446.70%13.30%19
  No3690%1653.30%2996.70%81

 

Table 5. Chi-Square and the Resulting P-Values of the Different Observed Variables Among the Studied Groups
 
Normocytic normochromicMicrocytic hypochromicAnisocytosisPoikilocytosisTarget cellsMacrocytes
*P-values denoting statistical significance.
GDM vs. controlChi-square5.3095.9738.8732.3514.0381.149
P-value0.021*0.015*0.003*0.1250.2550.383
GDM vs. DMChi-square5.2241.22819.29410.7557.0512.066
P-value0.022*0.2680.000011*0.001*0.008*0.001*
DM vs. ControlChi-square17.37610.841.713151515.022
P-value0.000031*0.001*0.000000*0.000108*0.000108*0.000106*