Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.thejh.org

Original Article

Volume 2, Number 1, June 2013, pages 14-21


Efficacy of Ribavirin to Prevent Hepatitis Reactivation in Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients Treated for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Single Egyptian Center Study

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The distribution of the study groups.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. One year disease-free survival.

Tables

Table 1. Patient Characteristics of the Studied Groups
 
VariableHCV +ve patientsHCV-ve patients Group C (33) No (%)P-value
Received Ribavirin Group A (11) No (%)Without Ribavirin Group B (13) No (%)
LN: Lymphadenopathy; DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; IPI: International Prognostic Index.
Age (years)Mean ± SD45 ± 15.952 ± 6.549 ± 13.70.496
SexMale6 (54.5%)5 (38.5%)19 (57.7%)0.50
Female5 (45.5%)8 (61.5%)14 (42.4%)
PSPS = 0.110(90.9% )11(84.6% )29 (87.9% )0.895
PS = 21 (9.1% )2 (15.4% )4 (12.1% )
ClinicalLN(only)7 (63.6%)6 (46.2%)20 (60.6%)0.424
Splenomegaly3 (27.3%)5 (38.5%)5 (15.2%)
Extranodal1 (9.1%)2 (15.4%)8 (24.2%)
StageI0 (0 %)1 (7.7%)4 (12.1%)0.224
II2 (18.2%)3 (23.1%)15 (45.5%)
III4 (36.4%)6 (46.2%)9 (27.3%)
IV5 (45.5%)3 (23.1%)5 (15.2%)
LDHNormal0 (0 %)0 (0 %)2 (6.1 %)0.471
High (234)11 (100%)13 (100%)31 (90.9%)
IPILow risk1 (9.1%)3 (23.1%)11 (33.3%)0.572
Low-intermediate risk8 (72.7%)8 (61.5%)18 (54.5%)
High intermediate risk2 (18.2%)2 (15.4%)3 (9.1%)
High risk0 (0 %)0 (0 %)1 (3.0%)
PathologyDLBCL8 (72.7%)7 (53.8%)24 (72.7%)0.130
Indolent NHL3 (27.3%)6 (46.2%)5 (15.2%)
- marginal zone lymphoma1 (9%)2 (15.3%)0 (0%)
- small lymphocytic lymphoma0 (0%)3 (23%)4 (12.1%)
- Mantle cell lymphoma1 (9%)1 (7.6%)1 (3%)
- Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma1 (9%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Burkitt0 (0%)0 (0%)4 (12.1%)
ChemotherapyCHOP8 (72.7%)7 (53.8%)24 (72.7%)0.165
-COP3 (27.3%)5 (38.5%)5 (15.2%))
-Hyper CVAD0 (0%)0(0 %)4 (12.1%)
-FC0 (0%)1 (7.7%)0 (0%)

 

Table 2. Comparison Between HCV + ve Patients Who Received Ribavirin (Group A) Versus Those Did Not Receive Ribavirin (Group B) Regarding Hepatic Enzyme Flare and HCV PCR Reactivation
 
VariableHCV + ve patientsP value
Received Ribavirin (11) No (%)Without Ribavirin (13) No (%)
Enzyme flare:0.605
  No8, 72.79, 69.2
  Yes3, 27.34, 30.8
PCR reactivation:0.585
  No9, 81.810, 76.9
  Yes2, 18.23, 23.1

 

Table 3. Frequency Treatment Disruption Among the Studied Groups of Patients According to Hepatic Enzyme Flare
 
VariableHepatic enzyme flareP value
No enzyme flare (49) No (%)With enzyme flare (8) No (%)
Chemotherapy course:0.002*
  -completed49, 1005, 62.5
  -stopped0, 03, 37.5

 

Table 4. Relation Between HCV PCR Reactivation in NHL Patients With HCV + ve and Hepatic Enzyme Flare
 
VariableHCV + ve NHL patientsP value
No HCV PCR reactivation No (19) %With HCV PCR reactivation No (5) %
Enzyme flare:< 0.001*
No17, 89.50, 0
Yes2, 10.55, 100

 

Table 5. Distribution of Treatment Response Among the Studied Groups of Patients According to HCV Status
 
ResponseHCV + ve patientsHCV-ve patients Group C (33) No (%)P value
Received Ribavirin Group A (11) No (%)Without Ribavirin Group B (13) No (%)
Responders0.329
Complete8, 72.76, 46.222, 66.7
Non-responders3, 27.37, 53.811, 33.3
Partial3, 27.35, 38.58, 24.2
Stable0, 0.01, 7.73, 9.1
Progression0, 0.01, 7.70, 0.0
Total11, 10013, 10033, 100